Legal Opinion
R.C. Olmstead, Inc. v. CU Interface, LLC
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 5, 2009No. Case 5:08CV234PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SARA LIOI, District Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion and Order arises out of the motions of Defendants CU Interface, LLC; Canton School Employees Federal Credit Union (“CSE”); Software Properties LLC; and Thomas Burkhardt (collectively, “Defendants”) to quash or modify the second subpoena of Craig Minch. (Doc. No. 109, 114.) Plaintiff R.C. Olmstead, Inc. (“RCO”) filed an opposition (Doc. No. 123), and Defendants have filed a reply (Doc. No. 129). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. 1
1. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The factual and procedural…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) and Charles R. Morse, (88-5942)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Durflinger v. ArtilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Employer's Reinsurance Corp. v. Clarendon National InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- House v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- FMC Corp. v. Vendo Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Layman ex rel. Layman v. Junior Players Golf Academy, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
- Ate My Heart, Inc. v. GA GA Jeans Limited, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2014
- Feliciano Munoz v. Rebarber OcasioDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2022
- Hobart Corporation, et al. v. Dayton Power and Light Company, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
- Holmes v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.