Hobart Corporation, et al. v. Dayton Power and Light Company, et al.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION HOBART CORPORATION, etal., —. Plaintiffs, V. Case No. 3:13-cv-115 DAYTON POWER AND LIGHT JUDGE WALTER H. RICE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. □ DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART CONAGRA’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO ADMIT THE STORY OF NORTON SIMON, INC., AS AN ANCIENT DOCUMENT (DOC. #1577); OVERRULING THE JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE DECLARATIONS AS SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE, FILED BY WASTE MANAGEMENT OF OHIO (“WMO”) AND CONAGRA (DOC. #1578); OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE TO…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.