Legal Opinion

Hobart Corporation, et al. v. Dayton Power and Light Company, et al.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 6, 2026No. 3:13-cv-00115Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION HOBART CORPORATION, etal., —. Plaintiffs, V. Case No. 3:13-cv-115 DAYTON POWER AND LIGHT JUDGE WALTER H. RICE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. □ DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART CONAGRA’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO ADMIT THE STORY OF NORTON SIMON, INC., AS AN ANCIENT DOCUMENT (DOC. #1577); OVERRULING THE JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE DECLARATIONS AS SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE, FILED BY WASTE MANAGEMENT OF OHIO (“WMO”) AND CONAGRA (DOC. #1578); OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE TO…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API