Legal Opinion
Henyard v. MV Transportation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 28, 2019No. 1:15-cv-10835Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PEARL HENYARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 15 C 10835 ) v. ) ) Judge Edmond E. Chang MV TRANSPORTATION and ) PACE SUBURBAN BUS SERVICE, ) ) Defendants ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pro se Plaintiff Pearl Henyard brings this Title VII suit against her former employers, MV Transportation and Pace Suburban Bus Service (collectively “Defendants”). R. 80, Am. Compl. ¶¶3-4.1 In her amended complaint, Henyard alleges that she experienced discrimination and harassment based on her sex. Id. ¶¶10, 22. After making a complaint…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.