Legal Opinion
Bullard v. Mult-A-Frame Company
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 21, 1971No. Docket 6919, 6925, 6973, 8608PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.
All four plaintiffs in this consolidated appeal seek this Court’s rejection of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board’s interpretation of Michigan law.1
The facts essential for our determination are few and uncomplicated. Plaintiff James Bullard injured his eye on January 7, 1965, and complete loss of vision occurred on February 19, 1966.2 Plaintiff Eichard Skelton injured his index finger on September 12, 1964. After all attempts at treating the finger had failed, it was amputated on July 21,1966. Plaintiff Nicholas Bellows injured his foot on January 26, 1961. Following unsuccessful…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leininger v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Goethal v. Kent County SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Allen v. Kalamazoo Paraffine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Detroit Board of Street Railway Commissioners v. County of WayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Scroggins v. Corning Glass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Florentine Ristorante, Inc. v. City of GrandvilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Sanders v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brown v. Warren Iron & Metal Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- McQueen v. Great Markwestern Packing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bullard v. Mult-A-Frame CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971