Detroit Board of Street Railway Commissioners v. County of Wayne
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
The plaintiff Department of Street Railways (DSR) has, over the years, paid both local taxes on its property situated outside Detroit’s city limits and county taxes in accordance with the 1909 Amendment to the home rule act, which authorized a home rule city to purchase a transportation utility,1 and which provided:
“When a transportation utility is so acquired, state and county taxes shall be paid thereon as if privately owned, also local taxes on any portion of such property lying outside of the city limits.” CL 1948, § 117.4f (Stat Ann 1949 Rev § 5.2079).
The State of Michigan has not levied…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ballog v. Knight Newspapers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Village of Kingsford v. CudlipMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- People ex rel. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Common Council v. SchmidMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. MiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Midland Township v. State Boundary CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Mooahesh v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gillette Commercial Operations North America & Subsidiaries v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Builders Square v. Department of AgricultureMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.