Legal Opinion
Anthony Mamo v. Beverly Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1963No. 19171_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEWIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent case in which Anthony Mamo, plaintiff-appellant, brought suit for infringement of his United States Letters Patent No. 2,798,625 against the Beverly Manufacturing Company, defendant-appellee, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division. The District Court held for the Beverly Manufacturing Company on the ground that Mamo did not have a valid patent in that the subject matter claimed therein was anticipated by the prior art.
The product involved is a small boat trailer on which one man can load a boat 14 to 16…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fritz W. Glitsch & Sons, Inc. v. Wyatt Metal & Boiler Works, Wyatt Metal & Boiler Works v. Fritz W. Glitsch & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Edward Valves, Inc., and Rockwell Manufacturing Company v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- In re WalkerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Maccarone v. Pincus & Tobias, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
- Harold William McClees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rena Kardulas v. Florida MacHine Products Company, R.C. Products, Inc., and John M. DudinskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Borden, Inc. v. Occidental Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
- Rena Kardulas v. Florida MacHine Products Company, R.C. Products, Inc., and John M. DudinskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971