Legal Opinion

Rena Kardulas v. Florida MacHine Products Company, R.C. Products, Inc., and John M. Dudinsky

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1971No. 29514_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

438 F.2d 1118

168 U.S.P.Q. 673

Rena KARDULAS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FLORIDA MACHINE PRODUCTS COMPANY, R.C. Products, Inc., and

John M. Dudinsky, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 29514.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 9, 1971, Rehearing Denied March 25, 1971.

T. Paine Kelly, Jr., Tampa, Fla., for defendants-appellants.

Owen Rice, Jr., Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before TUTTLE, DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

DYER, Circuit Judge:

1

Defendant, Florida Machine Products Company, made and sold hair roller holders which admittedly infringed United States Patent No. 3,128,882, entitled…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API