Legal Opinion

Borden, Inc. v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 19, 1974No. Civ. A. 70-H-149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.

This is a highly complex patent infringement suit involving what is alleged by plaintiff to be a “specifically claimed method of defluorinating phosphate rock” which is a “significant improvement of an earlier commercial process”. The products of both processes are used as ,j)hosphatie fertilizers and animal feed supplements.

Plaintiff Borden, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as “Borden”) is the owner of United States Patent 2,995,437 [Hollingsworth, filed 1959, granted 1961] (hereinafter referred to as the ’437 patent) which was obtained by…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nichols Institute Diagnostics, Inc. v. Scantibodies Clinical Laboratory, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2002
  2. Rosen v. Lawson-Hemphill, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975
  3. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Gillette Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
  4. Stearns v. Beckman Instruments, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
  5. Benchcraft, Inc. v. Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API