Legal Opinion

State v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 9, 1987No. Nos. 69633, 69853, 69835, 69894, 69943, 70079 and 70080PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have jurisdiction to review seven consolidated cases * which certify as a question of great public importance whether application of the penalty provisions of section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), to crimes committed prior to the effective date of the statute violate the ex post facto provisions of the United States and Florida Constitutions. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answer the question in the affirmative and approve the decisions below on the authority of State v. Yost, 507 So.2d 1099 (Fla.1987).

It is so ordered.

MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT and KOGAN,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. YostSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Bowman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Maldonado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Atyeo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rasul v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API