Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 16, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 89-1625Published

1DissentGerber, Judge

While I agree with the majority in upholding the conviction, I would modify the sentence by striking the $8.00 time payment fee.

Thomas committed the crime prior to the effective date of A.R.S. § 12-116 which generates the $8.00 time payment fee. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 1-246, an offender may be punished only under the law in force when the offense was committed. This principle reflects basic constitutional law. Here, A.R.S. § 12-116 was not in force when the offense was committed.

The majority relies on State v. Weinbrenner, 164 Ariz. 592, 795 P.2d 235 (App.1990), which held that the $8.00 time…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Young v. AltenhausSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. YostSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Schiefer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. MendivilArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. WeinbrennerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API