Baker v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Appellant, Gary Lee Baker, appeals that part of the trial court’s order that required him to pay $220 in court costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985). While appellant raises three issues on appeal, we need discuss only one, as it is dispositive.
Appellant argues that the order requiring him to pay costs violated the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws (U.S. Const, art. I, § 9; Fla. Const, art. I, § 10), since it imposed a penalty that was not in effect at the time that appellant committed the offense. See Yost v. State, 489 So.2d 131 (Fla.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Yost v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Bowman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BowmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1987