Legal Opinion
Hauschulz v. Michael Law Firm
Montana Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 2005No. 04-635PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Travis Hauschulz (Hauschulz) appeals from the judgment entered by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, on January 28, 2003, granting Michael Law Firm’s (Michael) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. We affirm the order of the District Court.
¶2 We address the following issue:
¶3 Did the District Court abuse its discretion in granting the motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶4 On August 13, 1998, Hauschulz was charged with criminal mischief, resisting arrest, and partner or family member assault in Billings, Montana.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Albert Nealey v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S. A. And Maersk LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Becky v. Norwest Bank Dillon, N.A.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
- Hauschulz v. Michael Law FirmMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Shackleton v. NeilMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- Hobble-Diamond Cattle, Co. v. Triangle Irrigation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Watson v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Lear v. JamrogowiczMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Berryman v. U.S. Bancorp and ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Berryman v. US BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY, INC.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- Hauschulz v. Michael Law FirmMontana Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.