Hauschulz v. Michael Law Firm
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter
¶1 Travis Hauschulz (Hauschulz), a prisoner in Idaho, filed this civil complaint for legal malpractice against the Michael Law Firm (Michael), arising out of Michael’s representation of him in criminal proceedings in Montana. The District Court dismissed the complaint when Hauschulz did not appear at the hearing, finding that Hauschulz stated no actionable claim. Hauschulz appeals. We reverse and remand.
¶2 The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in dismissing the civil action for malpractice for Hauschulz’ failure to state any claim upon which relief could be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merzlak v. PurcellMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Lockwood v. W. R. Grace & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
- Trankel v. State, Dept. of Military AffairsMontana Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re A.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
- Redies v. Attorneys Liability Protection SocietyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Ereth v. Cascade CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Labair Ex Rel. Labair v. CareyMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Fellows v. Office of Water CommissionerMontana Supreme Court · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.