Legal Opinion

Hauschulz v. Michael Law Firm

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2005No. 04-635Published

1Opinion of the Court

2005 MT 189

TRAVIS HAUSCHULZ, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL LAW FIRM, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 04-635

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted on Briefs: March 16, 2005

Decided: August 2, 2005

For Appellant: Travis Hauschulz, Pro Se, Hutchinson, Kansas.

For Respondent: Mark T. Errebo, Attorney at Law, Billings, Montana.

Justice Jim Rice delivered the Opinion of the Court.

¶1 Travis Hauschulz (Hauschulz) appeals from the judgment entered by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, on January 28, 2003, granting Michael Law Firm's (Michael) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Albert Nealey v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S. A. And Maersk LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Becky v. Norwest Bank Dillon, N.A.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hauschulz v. Michael Law FirmMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Shackleton v. NeilMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hobble-Diamond Cattle, Co. v. Triangle Irrigation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API