Legal Opinion

Glide v. City of Sacramento

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1928No. Docket No. Sac. 3995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The order granting defendant's motion for a change of venue in this action is affirmed on the authority of Finance & Construction Co. of California v. City of Sacramento, ante, p. 491 [269 Pac. 167]. The only difference in the two cases is that in this case the plaintiff is a private person, while in case No. 3996 the plaintiff is a corporation. This difference is not material to any question involved herein.

Hearing in Bank denied.

All the Justices present concurred.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Finance & Construction Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arcularius v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938