Legal Opinion

Arcularius v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1938No. Civ. No. 5814Published

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This action was begun by the plaintiffs to obtain an injunction against the defendants.

After the beginning of the action and the filing of the defendants’ answer herein, two of the plaintiffs filed a motion for transfer of the action for trial from the county of Mono to some other county to be selected by the court. This motion was denied and the plaintiffs, Prank H. Arcularius and Olive C. Arcularius, appealed from the order of the superior court denying their motion for a change of venue.

The plaintiffs allege in their complaint that they are the owners and in possession of certain real…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Finance & Construction Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. City of Stockton v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Williams v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Glide v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API