Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Wyeth, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 14, 2014No. Civil No. 3:04cv1373 (JBA)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.

Following a jury trial and a verdict in favor of Plaintiffs Margaret Fraser and Joseph Fraser, Defendants Wyeth, Inc. and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively “Wyeth”) move [Doc. # 337] pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) for judgment as a matter of law on all of Plaintiffs’ claims and move [Doc. #339] pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 for a new trial and remittitur of the punitive damages award. Plaintiffs move [Doc. #336] for post-verdict and post-judgment interest. For the reasons that follow,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Elizabeth Gordon v. New York City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Trejo v. Johnson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Batoh v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  3. DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE -TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-10160District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  4. DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-cv-15627District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  5. BARRY v. DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API