Legal Opinion

DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE -TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-10160

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 22, 2023No. 3:20-cv-10160Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RUTH E. STRONTZER, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-10160 (ZNQ) (TJB) v. OPINION JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. QURAISHI, District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants Mentor Worldwide LLC, Ethicon, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 38.) Alongside the Motion, Defendants submitted a Memorandum in Support. (“Moving Br.,” ECF No. 38-1.) Plaintiff Ruth E. Strontzer (“Plaintiff”) filed an Opposition. (“Opp’n Br.,” ECF No. 39.) In response,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API