Legal Opinion
BARRY v. DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIES
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 28, 2023No. 2:17-cv-03003Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : DR. MARK BARRY, : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civ. No. 17-3003 : DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, : INC., et al., : Defendants. : Diamond, J. July 28, 2023 MEMORANDUM Retired orthopedic surgeon Mark Barry alleges that medical device manufacturer DePuy induced surgeons to infringe his patents respecting surgical techniques and systems for correcting spinal deformities. (Am. Compl. (Doc. No. 20-2)); 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). Before trial, DePuy moved under Daubert to exclude the survey and expert testimony of Dr. David Neal. (Doc. No.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Schneider v. FriedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.