Legal Opinion

Brock Candy Co. v. Craton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1925No. 16143PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

(After setting forth the foregoing stated facts.) In our opinion the petition was not subject to any ground of the demurrer interposed. The extension of credit by the plaintiff to Austin in excess-of the sum of $500 did not release Craton. “If one assumes to pay a definite amount of the indebtedness of another, it is none of his concern whether the debt thus assumed is greater or less than the actual indebtedness.” Oglesby v. South Georgia Grocery Co., 18 Ga. App. 402 (5) (89 S. E. 436). See also Scarratt v. Cook Brewing Co., 117 Ga. 181 (1) (43 S. E. 413).

AYe think the contract of Craton…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manry v. Waxelbaum Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Wright v. ShorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  3. Watkins Medical Co. v. MarbachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Oglesby v. South Georgia Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National City Bank v. BusbinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Blalock v. Central Bank of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. West Cash & Carry Building Materials of Savannah, Inc. v. Liberty Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Craton v. Brock Candy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  5. Southeastern Automotive Warehouse, Inc. v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API