Legal Opinion

Craton v. Brock Candy Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1928No. 18164PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Brock Candy Company sued Craton upon his promise in writing, which reads as follows: “I will be responsible for W. S. Austin up to $500.00, but not over that amount. I would be glad if you would extend to him that amount of credit.” Construing the promise either as one of suretyship or as a guaranty, it continued until revoked; and although the principal, *729Austin, paid to the plaintiff his entire indebtedness in an amount in excess of $500, which was created as a result of credit extended to him by the plaintiff upon the faith of the defendant’s promise, the defendant is nevertheless liable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brock Candy Co. v. CratonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. Walter E. Heller & Co. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Seay's Home Furnishings, Inc. v. Dozier Home Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API