Legal Opinion

Van Schaick v. Carr

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

This action, a companion suit to Van Schaick v. Aron (170 Misc. 520), decided herewith, involves the liability of directors of State Title and Mortgage Company (hereinafter referred to as Mortgage Company) for losses claimed to have been sustained by the corporation on transactions alleged to have been in violation of statute.

Mortgage Company was one of the National American group, and many of the legal issues presented herein have already been covered in the decision in the Aron case. It will be necessary only to touch upon them briefly. The basis of liability in both cases is the same, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Gallin v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Medford Trust Co. v. McKnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Quinn v. PostDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Simon v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Mueller v. GittlesonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
  4. Tishman Realty & Construction Co. v. WolfAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API