Legal Opinion

State v. Byrkett

Miami County Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 1, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiserman, J.

Regret having been expressed by the committee in a brief furnished the court since the motion to make definite and certain was sustained, and the first charge was amended, that a demurrer was not interposed to the first charge instead of a motion; and the belief having been expressed that the court, under the statute, has not the right to subject the charges filed against an attorney at law to the criticism of a motion ■or a demurrer, the court is impelled briefly to notice this objection, because of the importance and the interest attaching to questions arising out of so grave a case as the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. People ex rel. Mulford v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
  3. In Re John PercyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Ex parte SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. In re Proceedings to PeytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API