State v. Byrkett
Miami County Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtHeiserman, J.
Regret having been expressed by the committee in a brief furnished the court since the motion to make definite and certain was sustained, and the first charge was amended, that a demurrer was not interposed to the first charge instead of a motion; and the belief having been expressed that the court, under the statute, has not the right to subject the charges filed against an attorney at law to the criticism of a motion ■or a demurrer, the court is impelled briefly to notice this objection, because of the importance and the interest attaching to questions arising out of so grave a case as the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- People ex rel. Mulford v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
- In Re John PercyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Ex parte SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- In re Proceedings to PeytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969