Legal Opinion
San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority v. State Water Resources Control Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 2010No. C060697PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
This appeal involves two water quality problems in the San Joaquin River. The first problem concerns high levels of salt and boron in a 130-mile stretch from Mendota Dam (west of Fresno) to Vemalis (near Tracy), a stretch referred to as the Lower San Joaquin River. The second problem involves low levels of dissolved oxygen in Stockton’s Deep Water Ship Channel (Ship Channel).
To address these problems, respondent Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board), and in turn respondent State Water Resources Control Board (State Board; collectively, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Sacramento Old City Ass'n v. City Council of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Avidity Partners v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. AbercrombieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- East Sacramento Partnerships for a Livable City v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- City of Arcadia v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Allen v. American Medical Response West CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.