Legal Opinion

Hoefs v. CACV OF COLORADO, LLC

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 24, 2005No. C.A. 04-30015-MAPPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (Docket Nos. 59, 27 & 31)

PONSOR, District Judge.

On February 25, 2005, Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman issued his Report and Recommendation, to the effect that the defendants’ Motions to Compel Arbitration be allowed. No objection to this Report and Recommendation has been filed by the plaintiff in accordance with Rule 3(b) of the Rules for United States Magistrates in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Moreover, Magistrate Judge Neiman’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  4. Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  5. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oyola v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. Khath v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. Feil v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  4. Robertson v. JC Penney Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2007
  5. Card v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API