Legal Opinion

Hueper v. Goodrich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 22, 1982No. 81-21Published

1Opinion of the Court

314 N.W.2d 828 (1982)

Bruce HUEPER, a minor child, by Sharon Hueper, his mother and Guardian, Respondents,

v.

Dean GOODRICH and John M. Neubauer, defendants and third party plaintiffs, Appellants,

Arland Gregor and Emil Hueper, third party Defendants, Respondents.

Emil W. HUEPER and Sharon Hueper, Respondents,

v.

Dean GOODRICH and John M. Neubauer, defendants and third party plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

The FORD MOTOR COMPANY, third party defendant, Respondent.

Bruce HUEPER, Respondent,

v.

The FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Respondent,

Emil W. HUEPER and Sharon Hueper, Respondents,

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Respondent.

No.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Dahlin v. KronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Hueper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. LoescherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API