O'Connor-Harrison v. United States

In this case the United States Customs Court held that braids made of undyed sea grass were dutiable as manufactures of grass and that cords made in part of dyed sea grass were dutiable as nonenu-merated manufactures. This court reversed the judgment of the United States Customs Court as to the braids and affirmed its judgment as to the cords.1 Attention having been called to the fact that no appeal had been taken by the Government from the judgment holding the braids to be manufactures of grass, this court sua sponte granted a rehearing. The Government submits without argument the point…