Nozaki Bros. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Richabdson, Judge:
These^four consolidated cases involving Japanese canned clams are before us a second time, having been restored to the calendar by the order of this court for the production of further evidence. See Nozaki Bros. Inc., and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 398, Abstract 59833.
The action arose as a result of the failure of the collector at the port of Los Angeles to use as a basis for the assessment of duties in liquidation, the dutiable value of the merchandise as found by this court in reappraisement proceedings. These values were incorporated in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lowery v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- Frazier v. JeakinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- United States v. Kurtz, Stuböeck & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- O'Connor-Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- C. O. Mason, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Close v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Lekas & Drivas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- United Asia Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Whitaker ex rel. Account of Volkart Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959