Decca Radar, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Watson, Judge:
These protests which were consolidated for trial, relate to certain merchandise described on the invoices as “Magnifiers,” type 4436 A, which was classified under paragraph 228(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Japanese Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 53865, supplemented by T.D. 53877, at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem as microscopes, finished or unfinished, not specially provided for, valued over $50 each. It was agreed between the parties that the articles are valued each over $50 (R. 4).
Plaintiff herein…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Connor-Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Laco Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Parsons Optical Laboratories Harper, Robinson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- ADC Telecomms., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017