Legal Opinion
Elizabethtown Water Co. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 29, 1998No. CIV. A. 95-3326PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Centennial Insurance Co.’s (“Centennial”) motion for summary judgment on Elizabethtown Water Company’s (“Elizabethtown”) claims for indemnity. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (“Hartford”) also moves for summary judgment of Elizabethtown’s claims for indemnity. The Court has decided these motions upon the written submissions of the parties pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Elizabethtown also moves the Court to strike sections of Centennial’s reply brief.
BACKGROUND
In an underlying action, Big Sheepy…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tischio v. Bontex, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Jurista v. Amerinox Processing, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Bayer AG v. Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Goldenberg v. Indel, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Yurecko v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.