Legal Opinion
Yurecko v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 18, 2003No. Civil Action 99-5458(JLL)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LINARES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Third-Party Plaintiff, Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation’s (hereinafter “PATH”) motion for reconsideration pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(g) of this Court’s ruling on April 14, 2003, granting summary judgment to Third-Party Defendants, Parson Brinckerhoff (hereinafter “Parsons”) and Joseph Muscarelle, Ine./Gemini (hereinafter “Muscarelle”). Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78, no oral argument was heard. For the reasons discussed below, PATH’S motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND FACTS
In the mid-1980’s the Third-Party Plaintiff, PATH,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Compaction Systems Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Florham Park Chevron, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- NL Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Oritani Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fellenz v. Lombard Investment Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
- Feit v. Great-West Life and Annuity Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- CHAMPION LABORATORIES, INC. v. Metex Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- United States v. $7,599,358.09District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.