Legal Opinion
In Re John M. Corkill
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 27, 1985No. Appeal 84-1683, 84-1684PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated appeals are from the decisions of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (the Board) sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claims 2-11, 13-28, 35-42, 49-58, 60-62, 64-74, and 77-79 in patent application Serial No. 450,266 as unpatentable for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103; and the rejection of claims 1, 3-11, 16, 18, 19 and 21-28 in Serial No. 036,615 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §§ 103 and 112. Serial No. 036,615 is a continuation of Serial No. 450,-266, and differs only in the claimed particle size ranges. Both are the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Frank N. Piasecki and Donald N. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In re RinehartCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. Guardian Industries CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- In Re Hans OetikerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.