Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 15, 1997No. 142, Sept.Term, 1995PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

We are called upon in this case to examine the permissible scope of a protective frisk for concealed weapons during the noncustodial detention of an individual suspected of being *463armed and dangerous. The specific question before the Court is whether a police officer, after patting down a suspect’s outer clothing and detecting no weapons, may further verify that a suspect is unarmed by lifting the suspect’s shirt to reveal the waistband of his pants. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the police officer acted improperly in engaging in this secondary, more intrusive…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. In Re David S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Sellman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Chase v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API