McDonald v. Yoder
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Neosho district court; OSCAR FOUST, judge, pro tem.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
Defendant in error-recovered a judgment for damages for personal injuries against the plaintiff in error, who brings the case here for review. There are substantially two grounds of error assigned: First, that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence; second, that the court erred in ■denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.
It appears by the evidence that Miss Yoder and two ■other girls were riding on horseback in the little town •of Earleton, going in a westerly direction along the main street, or road,…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- West Construction Co. v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Lindquist v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Steele v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Goodloe v. Jo-Mar Dairies Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.