Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Yoder

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1909No. 15,962PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from Neosho district court; OSCAR FOUST, judge, pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

Defendant in error-recovered a judgment for damages for personal injuries against the plaintiff in error, who brings the case here for review. There are substantially two grounds of error assigned: First, that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence; second, that the court erred in ■denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

It appears by the evidence that Miss Yoder and two ■other girls were riding on horseback in the little town •of Earleton, going in a westerly direction along the main street, or road,…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. West Construction Co. v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Lindquist v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Steele v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  5. Goodloe v. Jo-Mar Dairies Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API