Legal Opinion
Max Hirsch v. Frank W. McCulloch Walter A. Kelley v. Frank W. McCulloch
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 15, 1962No. 16590, 16596PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, owners or trainers of thoroughbred race horses, are employers of grooms, exercise boys, “hot walkers” and other stable employees whom the Union 1 in New York seeks to represent. Such employees frequently and periodically move from state to state in their transportation and care of the horses which are engaged in horse-racing where licensed. The employers in the District Court charged that the Board had unlawfully declined without a hearing to assume jurisdiction over .the business of raising, training and racing of such horses, despite the multi-state…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. ButzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Herbert Harvey, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- The New York Racing Association, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board and New York State Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Radio Broadcast Technicians Local Union No. 1264 v. Jemcon Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- University of Vermont v. State of Vt.District Court, D. Vermont · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.