Hanlin Group, Inc. v. Power Authurity of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WALKER, District Judge:
Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, violations of applicable statutes of limitations, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff claims jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1331 (“federal question”) and 1332 (“diversity”). This motion is granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) on the ground that this Court refuses jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the Burford abstention doctrine.
I. BACKGROUND
This is a rate dispute case concerning the sale of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Cruz v. TD Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Feiwus v. Genpar, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- M.D. v. PerryDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Bethphage Lutheran Service, Inc. v. WeickerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.