Jenkins v. Carruth
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDA OPINION AND ORDERS
NEESE, Senior District Judge, sitting by designation.
I
A contested issue of law in this civil rights action, see 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is whether the Court should exercise pendent jurisdiction over the claims of the plaintiffs which arise under state law. Pretrial order herein of September 1, 1982, § V(a). Ordinarily, remedy for these types of injuries “ * * * must be sought in state court under tranditional tort-law principles. * * ” Baker v. McCollan (1979), 443 U.S. 137, 146, 99 S.Ct. 2689, 2695, 61 L.Ed.2d 433, 443[11, 12].
“ * * * [U]nlike a claim within the court’s…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robertson v. WegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Anderson v. Dunbar Armored, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
- Fitzgerald v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Tauriac v. Polaroid CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Expertise, Inc., D/B/A Champion Warehouse Distributors v. Aetna Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Smith v. Southeastern Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.