Legal Opinion

Hammac v. Skinner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 24, 1956No. 2 Div. 365PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

On this appeal the important question is whether the bill in equity shows a right of complainants on the rescission of a transaction to recover expenses which they incurred in preparing to utilize the property purchased.

Complainants, to whom we will refer as appellees, and respondent to whom we will refer as appellant, made an agreement, exhibit A to the bill of complaint, which is as follows:

“Jan. 15th. 1953.
“Mr. Bert Skinner
“Mr. Charles Skinner,
“Gentlemen:
“This is to acknowledge receipt of Ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) paid to me this date by you to apply on purchase of and to guarantee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wintz v. MorrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Lilienfeld's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  3. Holland v. Western Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Bullard Shoals Mining Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Sidney Stevens Implement Co. v. HintzeUtah Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jennings v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Head & Seemann, Inc. v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. Doswell v. HughenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Green v. HemmertCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Hammac v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API