Hammac v. Skinner

89 So.2d 70 (1956)

Roy HAMMAC

v.

Bert SKINNER et al.

2 Div. 365.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 24, 1956.

Rehearing Denied August 2, 1956.

Pitts & Pitts, Selma, for appellant.

Pettus, Fuller, Reeves & Stewart, Selma, for appellees.

On this appeal the important question is whether the bill in equity shows a right of complainants on the rescission of a transaction to recover expenses which they incurred in preparing to utilize the property purchased.

Complainants, to whom we will refer as appellees, and respondent to whom we will refer as appellant, made an agreement, exhibit A to the bill of complaint,…