Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gabriel v. Youngstown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1996No. 1995-1378PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 618.] THE STATE EX REL. GABRIEL ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN ET AL.; OHIO COUNCIL 8, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as State ex rel. Gabriel v. Youngstown,

1996-Ohio-445.] Criminal law—Drug offenses—R.C. 2925.03(M), 2925.11(F)(1) and 9225.23(H) do not violate the due process or equal protection provisions of the Ohio or United States Constitution. (No. 95-1378—Submitted April 30, 1996—Decided June 19, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Grava v. Parkman Twp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Tschantz v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Ohio Council 8, Am. Fedn. of State, Cty. & Mun. Emp., AFL-CIO v. State Emp. Relations Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API