Legal Opinion

Realty Ltd v. Progress Prop. South Ltd., 86937 (7-19-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 2007No. Nos. 86937 88540PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, MDM Realty Ltd., Michael Maloof, Daniel Maloof, and Maloof Ltd. (collectively "MDM"), appeal the trial court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Progress Properties South Limited Partnership, 1100 Carnegie LLP, and Firstar Bank ("Firstar").1

{¶ 2} In 1998, the City of Cleveland enacted ordinances vacating portions of East 12th Street, East 13th Street, and Webster Avenue in downtown Cleveland. In 2002, MDM filed a complaint alleging that the City improperly vacated the streets and unlawfully transferred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pang v. MinchOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Transamerica Insurance v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Maritime Manufacturers, Inc. v. Hi-Skipper MarinaOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Set Products, Inc. v. Bainbridge Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Bankers Title Escrow Agency, 88847 (8-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Monahan v. Duke Realty Corp., C-070318 (3-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API