Legal Opinion

Trachtenburg v. Sibarco Stations, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1978No. 113, 114 and 115PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANDERINO, Justice.

Appellant, Sibarco Stations, Inc., entered into agreements with appellees to purchase contiguous parcels of real estate in Homestead, Pennsylvania, for the purpose of constructing a service station. The purchase of each parcel was contingent, inter alia ; upon the consummation of all the purchas es; upon the premises being free and clear of all leases; and upon appellant’s receipt of the necessary permits for construction. Nearly six months after accepting appellees’ offer, but before a closing date was agreed upon, appellant informed appellees it was cancelling the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Black v. American International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Freeman v. LawtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Commonwealth v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Tripp v. BishopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  5. Heights Land Co. v. Swengel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Abboud v. Ground Round, Inc. (In Re Ground Round, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Osborne v. BullinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bafile v. Borough of MuncySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Petry v. Tanglwood Lakes, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Leslie Fay Companies v. Corporate Property Associates 3 (In Re Leslie Fay Companies)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API