Legal Opinion

State v. . Oldham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The defendant assigns .error in the ruling of the court below in denying his motion for judgment of nonsuit. He contends that the evidence offered by the State was insufficient to sustain a conviction for vagrancy as charged in the warrant under which he was put to trial.

The statutory definition of vagrancy (G. S., 14-336) includes seven classes: “1. Persons wandering or strolling about in idleness who are able to work and have no property to support them. 2. Persons leading an idle, immoral or profligate life, who have no property to support them and who are able to work and do not work. 3.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Jacobs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Gregory v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. People v. SohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API