Legal Opinion
Rachel Mather v. Village of Mundelein
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 21, 1989No. 88-3226PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before COFFEY, FLAUM and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff seeks rehearing on two grounds. The merits were covered by our initial opinion, 864 F.2d 1291, and as the same question is before the Supreme Court in American Civil Liberties Union v. County of Allegheny, 842 F.2d 655 (3d Cir.), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 53, 102 L.Ed.2d 32 (1988), to be argued on February 22, 1989, reconsideration of the merits in this court would be wasted motion. The future of the display in Munde-lein will be governed by the Supreme Court’s views, not by ours.
Plaint…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rhodes v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pennsylvania v. BruderSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- George E. Apostol v. Mark Gallion, John Auriemma v. Fred Rice, and City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Rufus R. Brooks v. Allison Division of General Motors Corporation, and Local 933, United Auto Workers, Defendants-AppellesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Shmael Turkhan v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Danny D. FortnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Macon County v. Merscorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.