Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 20, 1979No. 783DC351PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The court, sitting without a jury, granted defendants’ motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. As plaintiff points out, the correct motion would have been for an involuntary dismissal under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(b), since the action was being tried without a jury. Compare G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50, Comment. However, such a motion, though improperly designated, may be treated on appeal as having been made under Rule 41. Higgins v. Builders & Finance, Inc., 20 N.C. App. 1, 200 S.E. 2d 397 (1973), cert. den. 284 N.C. 616, 201 S.E. 2d 689 (1974). Treating this motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Whitaker v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Higgins v. BUILDERS AND FINANCE INCORPORATEDCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Carteret County General Hospital Corp. v. ManningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Memorial Hospital of Alamance County, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Daniels v. Montgomery Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Newsome v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Young v. Kuehne Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Vernon v. LoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API