Joyner v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The court, sitting without a jury, granted defendants’ motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. As plaintiff points out, the correct motion would have been for an involuntary dismissal under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(b), since the action was being tried without a jury. Compare G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50, Comment. However, such a motion, though improperly designated, may be treated on appeal as having been made under Rule 41. Higgins v. Builders & Finance, Inc., 20 N.C. App. 1, 200 S.E. 2d 397 (1973), cert. den. 284 N.C. 616, 201 S.E. 2d 689 (1974). Treating this motion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Whitaker v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Higgins v. BUILDERS AND FINANCE INCORPORATEDCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Carteret County General Hospital Corp. v. ManningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- Memorial Hospital of Alamance County, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Daniels v. Montgomery Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Newsome v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Young v. Kuehne Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Vernon v. LoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002