Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Montgomery Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 1986No. 8522SC1011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action seeking to recover on a fire insurance policy. At the third trial of this matter plaintiff’s counsel, in his opening argument, violated the trial court’s order granting a motion in limine by referring to the fact that plaintiff had not been criminally prosecuted for burning his house. The trial court declared a mistrial and pursuant to Rule 41(b) ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant’s costs and attorney’s fees connected with the third trial. Plaintiff did not pay. The trial court, pursuant to Rule 41(b), dismissed plaintiff’s claim and awarded…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sam ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Scarborough v. EubanksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Antowyn Cauley v. John WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Persis Nova Construction, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Page v. MandelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Patterson v. SweattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Rivenbark v. Southmark Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Plasman v. Decca Furniture (Usa), Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API