Legal Opinion

Seneca Companies v. Becker

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided September 17, 2015No. 4:15-cv-00035-JEGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES E. GRITZNER, Senior Judge,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

This matter is before the Court on Motion by Defendant Midway Industrial Supply, Inc., (Midway) to dismiss the Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Seneca Companies, Inc., (Seneca) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, to transfer venue to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. Seneca resists Midway’s Motion. The parties have not requested a hearing, and the Court finds a hearing is unnecessary. The Motion is fully submitted and ready for consideration.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adewol v. Frickenschmidt Foods LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
  2. Melichar v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kan., Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API