Legal Opinion
State v. Woods
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 2, 1996No. 15392PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Presiding Judge.
The appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals, pursuant to R.C. 2945.67 and Crim.R. 12(J), from the judgment of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas which sustained appellee Richard Lee Woods’s, motion to suppress evidence. The state brings one assignment of error.
The court related the following factual findings established at the hearing on Woods’s motion to suppress:
“Officer [Kenneth Daley of the Dayton Police Department] and his partner were assigned to surveil an address known as 200 Metro Gardens. This was an apartment suspected to be used for the sale of crack…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. HansardOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. CoreOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. Potter, Ca2006-07-166 (8-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. HintonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.