Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2011No. ED 95922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROY L. RICHTER, Chief Judge.

Timothy Williams (“Williams”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Williams claims he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel, and therefore the motion court clearly erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief. Finding no error, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A jury convicted Williams of murder in the first degree, armed criminal action, and first-degree burglary. This Court affirmed his convictions and sentences in State v. Williams, 177 S.W.3d 858 (Mo. App. E.D.2005).…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. EDDIE WAYNE SMITH, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API