Legal Opinion

Company Doe v. Tenenbaum

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 8:11-cv-02958-AWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REVISED MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.

Plaintiff Company Doe initiates this action against the following Defendants: (1) Inez Tenenbaum, in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission; and (2) the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Plaintiff asserts four related claims under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). Concerning its APA claims, Plaintiff contends that the Commission’s decision to publish a report implicating Plaintiffs product in [redacted] is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, in excess of its…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pearl River Union Free School District v. DuncanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API